Maadarani, A. (2026). Culinary Adjudication Measurement Science: Founding a New Science for Measuring Dish Quality, Judge Reliability, and Decision Fairness. Master Chefs International Journal, IUOAMC Global Platform.
Hidden Repeat Test
Scientific Thesis
A selected sample is repeated under a new code and different order without informing the judge, allowing decision consistency to be measured.
Position within CAMS
This part converts principles into an executable judging protocol. It separates first observation, confidence registration, contextual disclosure, sample repetition, consistency verification, and the independent final decision.
The subject of “Hidden Repeat Test” is treated as an operationally definable component rather than a general verbal opinion. The term must be connected to a specific judging event, retainable data, and a declared method for distinguishing observation from inference. This separation prevents personal expertise from becoming authority that cannot be reviewed.
Proposed Foundational Rule
A selected sample is repeated under a new code and different order without informing the judge, allowing decision consistency to be measured. This rule is a foundational hypothesis within the new science. Its future strength depends on testing, reapplication, and comparison of results, not on declaration alone. A clear distinction is maintained between founding a scientific field and claiming that all of its laws have already received empirical confirmation.
Operational Definition and Measurement
Samples and judges are coded, each stage is time-locked before the next begins, and earlier records cannot be edited after new information appears. Differences between stages are treated as scientific data rather than errors to be concealed.
The process begins by defining the target variable, choosing a baseline, and conducting a comparison under known conditions. Raw score, confidence, time, and stage are recorded before any composite indicator is produced. Values that conflict with panel expectation must not be concealed because they may reveal a problem in the sample, judge, or procedure.
Applied Procedure
- Define the purpose before tasting begins.
- Code the dish and judge and conceal unnecessary information.
- Record score, confidence, and time independently.
- Conduct the required comparison or repeat.
- Calculate and interpret the difference before confirmation.
- Preserve the record for review and verification.
Field of Use
The protocol is usable in physical and digital judging, judge accreditation examinations, product and restaurant evaluation, and applied education programs.
Testable Hypothesis
This chapter proposes that integrating “Hidden Repeat Test” into session design will increase the panel’s ability to explain scores, reduce untraceable decisions, and make professional disagreement analyzable rather than a confrontation between preferences. The proposition must be tested across multiple sessions before final thresholds are fixed.
Scientific Integrity Controls
This is an original foundational work and contains no external reference list. Concepts, laws, equations, and protocols are therefore presented as scientific constructs proposed by the founder, while practical effects remain subject to testing, calibration, and independent review. The absence of external references does not remove the need for evidence; it makes the production of empirical evidence a necessary next phase.
Section Conclusion
This component adds a defined building block to CAMS by connecting a decision with its conditions, source, and method of measurement while preserving the role of human expertise. The goal is not to replace the judge, but to make adjudicative authority fairer, clearer, more responsible, and capable of systematic development.
